The Massassi Temple:   [Main/News]  [Reviews]  [Forums]  [Levels]  [Submissions
Jedi Knight
» Single Player
» Multiplayer
» CTF
» Mods


MotS
» Single Player
» Multiplayer
» KFY
» Mods
The Massassi Temple: Reviews General
» Ratings Info
» Help Wanted
» Credits



JKT - Morbius ]|[
Author: [DotF_Lightside] Reviewer: [darkjedi86]
[Add a Comment] [Back to Review]


Posted By: Comment:
darkjedi86What do you all think? Was I a bit too harsh on this one? I hope not! Comments, come to me!
lightsideActually, there WAS some lighting, by the elevators. And the architexture wasn't that great? :( Dang. And it was boxy? Hmm... Oh, and about the CMP thing...I couldn't see it in the JED mode, and didn't notice it til I released it. Sorry about that everyone. Oh well...Maybe, just maybe I can get a good score on my next level. Thanx for reviewing it so fast though DarkJedi86. At least above average.
ThreeDeeI think you were a bit harsh. Despite minor errors like the slight colourmap thing and various texture misalignments, this level deserved well over 52. I agree on the placement of the concussion rifle, but this level is very open, so it's not too hard to escape quickly. I also thought the architecture was pretty cool, and the lighting while bright, was not inexistant. I think it deserves points for a very creative and playable design. Not many levels use this type of open style.
Z@NARDINah you wern't harsh, i mean these are reviews tell the truth so if you make them sound good people might DL them and say "well hey this sucks" (not directed to lightside at all) and then everyone would be mad :) ya see!
Jedi JoshNah, not harsh. Call it "tough love." How else is anyone going to improve if you sugar coat there levels? I haven't played the level, I'm just stating that you weren't harsh.
JuztynSo am I to believe that this thing had worse arch, lighting, and texturing then Jedi's High School? Bah, seems to me one of these reviews is wrong (this or JHS) - no offense.
Home_SlicedMaybe a few points too low, but your not really that far off IMO. A score in the high 50s or low 60s would be a little more deserving (once again IMO) in comparison to some other levels that have been reviewed. Tough to keep it consistant with all the different reviewers though.
lightsideThanx all for the feedback :) And don't worry bout it DarkJedi86, that's your opinion. If you didn't like the level, that's fine by me. And Juztyn, I don't know if I caught what you meant...You mean the arch in here, along with that other stuff you mentioned was BETTER than JHS, or WORSE-R (lol)? Well, I am so far happy with my new arena-creation. I thought it was my best (that I have sent to a site). I have some SNAZZY ones for the Army TC, and JKT.
JuztynJudging by the screenshots, the arch in this level is 10 times better then that JHS crap. This level deserved more then it got, from what I saw.
JK [Meteor]Actually, when I saw the architecture I was thinking it was very ultimate. The texturing seemed too grey for me though.
LightsideWow, thanx guys!! You don't know HOW much comments on levels mean to me. That makes me want to go out, and make something HUGE. Hmm..... *grins*
DarthWeaselDo you really think that you should review un-original levels? This is a conversion from an Unreal Tournament level,and while im sure lightside put work into it i'd rather see originality,not somthing ive played in another game with a better engine.although massassi can't possibly know every level from every game so... im going to shut up now....
LightsideDW, people get ideas from other games. A LOT of the levels out there have some portrayal of other levels of games in them. And I don't believe this looks anything like the first two, except for the rounded arena part. I added MUCH more than I should have.


http://www.php.net http://www.mysql.com http://www.jgsoft.com

© Copyright 2000 The Massassi Temple

Nothing on this site is made, distributed, or supported by LEC. Use and download all information/files at your own risk. We do our best to keep our content free of objectionable material, but we cannot guarantee that sites we link to take the same stance, be aware of what you and/or your children are visiting on the internet.